Abstract

This article considers the impact of ambiguity in strategic situations. It extends the existing literature on games with ambiguity‐averse players by allowing for optimistic responses to ambiguity. We use the CEU model of ambiguity with a class of capacities introduced by Jaffrray and Philippe (Mathematics of Operations Research 22 (1997), 165–85), which allows us to distinguish ambiguity from ambiguity‐attitude, and propose a new solution concept, equilibrium under ambiguity (EUA), for players who may be characterized by ambiguity‐preference. Applying EUA, we study comparative statics of changes in ambiguity‐attitude in games with strategic complements. This extends work in Eichberger and Kelsey (Journal of Economic Theory 106 (2002), 436–66) on the effects of increasing ambiguity if players are ambiguity averse.

Highlights

  • Beginning with the seminal work of von-Neumann and Morgenstern (1944), expected utility theory (EUT) has been closely related to the analysis of strategic decision-making

  • There is a small literature about strategic behaviour in games, reviewed below, which deals with the three main issues arising in games by departing from expected utility theory: 1. How much consistency in beliefs does one want to impose in equilibrium? 2

  • We have studied the impact of ambiguity in games with players who are not necessarily ambiguity-averse

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Beginning with the seminal work of von-Neumann and Morgenstern (1944), expected utility theory (EUT) has been closely related to the analysis of strategic decision-making. How much consistency in beliefs does one want to impose in equilibrium? 3. How do attitudes towards ambiguity a¤ect behaviour in games?. As we will show, extending the analysis to include ambiguity-seeking requires us to reconsider the question of consistency in beliefs. Instead we use lattice theory to demonstrate existence of equilibrium in games with increasing di¤erences.. Instead we use lattice theory to demonstrate existence of equilibrium in games with increasing di¤erences.1 We view it as an advantage of this approach that it enables us to study existence and comparative statics in a common framework. Games with increasing di¤erences have many economic applications, for instance in industrial organization, macroeconomics, and public good provision

Ambiguity and Ambiguity-Attitudes
Ambiguity in Games with Positive Externalities
MODELLING OPTIMISM IN GAMES
Non-Additive Beliefs and Choquet Integrals
Modelling Players’Preferences
The Support of a Capacity
Existence of Equilibrium
Comparative statics
LITERATURE REVIEW
CONCLUSION
A ALTERNATIVE NOTIONS OF SUPPORT
Existence
The Centipede Game
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.