Abstract

Five different computational methodologies are studied and evaluated for the purpose of determining optimal regularization parameters. These methods include the maximum likelihood (ML), the ordinary cross-validation (OCV), the generalized cross-validation (GCV), the L-curve method, and the discrepancy principle (DP). This is the first time that these five methods are compared simultaneously by using the same example problems for the inverse heat transfer problem. Testing results show that the discrepancy principle gives the best estimate of the regularization parameter. In many cases, the OCV and GCV are the second and third best methods, and the L-curve method is the fourth most accurate method among the five methods. The ML method is very stable but always estimates smaller regularization parameters than in the analytical solution.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.