Abstract

Proper fertilization of golf course putting greens during grow‐in provides rapid turfgrass cover, high quality putting surfaces, and limits environmental impacts. Different levels of N and K were applied to ‘TifDwarf’ and ‘TifEagle’ bermudagrasses [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burt Davy], ‘SeaDwarf’ seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz), and ‘PristineFlora’ zoysiagrass [Zoysia japonica Stued. by Zoysia tenuifolia (L.) Merr.], sprigged at a rate of 36.6 m3 ha−1 on a USGA‐specified green, to compare grow‐in rate and qualitative turfgrass characteristics. Fertilizer treatments included 1.2, 2.4, 3.7, or 4.9 g N m−2 wk−1, and a one‐time application of polymer‐coated urea (PCU) at 39.1 g N m−2, with each N rate coinciding with four N/K fertilization ratios: 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, or 1:4. Visual measurements of grow‐in rate were generally similar within cultivars with 2.4, 3.7, or 4.9 g N m−2 wk−1 There were no significant effects for turfgrass growth or quality among N/K treatments. The 2.4 g N m−2 wk−1 rate was considered best for rapid establishment of all cultivars. Although 1.2 g N m−2 wk−1 amended turfgrass was slower to establish, this rate provided a more desirable putting surface and further decreased the potential for nutrient leaching.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.