Optimal Medical Therapy and OutcomesAmong Patients With ChronicHeartFailure With Reduced EjectionFraction.

Abstract

Optimal medical therapy (OMT) scoring may stratify clinical risk in real-world chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) by integrating use and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HFrEF. The purpose of this study was to characterize patients and associated long-term clinical outcomes by OMT score-derived treatment groups. CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients with HeartFailure) included U.S. outpatients with chronic HFrEF receiving≥1 GDMT. OMT subgroups were defined as suboptimal (score<3), acceptable (score=3), and optimal (score≥4) by baseline use and dose of GDMT, as proposed by the HF Collaboratory consortium. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess for all-cause and cardiovascular death across subgroups, after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. The authors studied 4,582 participants enrolled in CHAMP-HF with available 2-year follow-up. Median age was 68 years, 1,327 (29%) were women, and 2,842 (62%) were White, non-Hispanic. Median OMT score across the population was 4 (Q1-Q3: 2-5), and 1,628 (35%) had suboptimal, 665 (14%) had acceptable, and 2,289 (50%) had optimal therapy. Participants with optimal treatment were younger, had higher annual household income, and were enrolled from practices with dedicated HF clinics (all P< 0.001) than participants with acceptable or suboptimal treatment. Participants with optimal treatment had lower all-cause death (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.64-0.92) and cardiovascular death (adjusted HR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.65-0.96) than those with suboptimal treatment. Across a large cohort of chronic ambulatory HFrEF, OMT scores stratified risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.