Abstract

BackgroundControlling the false discovery rate is important when testing multiple hypotheses. To enhance the detection capability of a false discovery rate control test, we applied the likelihood ratio-based multiple testing method in neuroimage data and compared the performance with the existing methods.MethodsWe analysed the performance of the likelihood ratio-based false discovery rate method using simulation data generated under independent assumption, and positron emission tomography data of Alzheimer’s disease and questionable dementia. We investigated how well the method detects extensive hypometabolic regions and compared the results to those of the conventional Benjamini Hochberg-false discovery rate method.ResultsOur findings show that the likelihood ratio-based false discovery rate method can control the false discovery rate, giving the smallest false non-discovery rate (for a one-sided test) or the smallest expected number of false assignments (for a two-sided test). Even though we assumed independence among voxels, the likelihood ratio-based false discovery rate method detected more extensive hypometabolic regions in 22 patients with Alzheimer’s disease, as compared to the 44 normal controls, than did the Benjamini Hochberg-false discovery rate method. The contingency and distribution patterns were consistent with those of previous studies. In 24 questionable dementia patients, the proposed likelihood ratio-based false discovery rate method was able to detect hypometabolism in the medial temporal region.ConclusionsThis study showed that the proposed likelihood ratio-based false discovery rate method efficiently identifies extensive hypometabolic regions owing to its increased detection capability and ability to control the false discovery rate.

Highlights

  • Controlling the false discovery rate is important when testing multiple hypotheses

  • Results of the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and questionable dementia (QD) data analysis In probable AD cases, all methods revealed hypometabolic regions at FDR method. (FDR) level 0.01 (Figure 2). Both the one-sided and two-sided tests of likelihood-ratio-based FDR (LR-FDR) showed hypometabolism in the bilateral posterior cingulate, frontal, temporal, and parietal areas, the extent of which was wider than that shown by conventional BHFDR

  • The LR-FDR method showed that the hypometabolic regions spread to the posterior prefrontal and anterior occipital regions in the AD group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To enhance the detection capability of a false discovery rate control test, we applied the likelihood ratio-based multiple testing method in neuroimage data and compared the performance with the existing methods. Lee and Bjørnstad [4] proposed a new multiple hypothesis test based on the likelihood-ratio-based FDR (LR-FDR). They showed that the problem of large-scale multiple testing is naturally expressed as an inference problem for finding the true discoveries. Lee and Bjørnstad [4] showed how the extended likelihood can be used to derive their proposed LR-FDR method This method is optimal when (a) determining the order in which the test results can be called significant and (b) controlling error rates given this order. The likelihood approach provides various well-developed modelchecking and model-selection procedures

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.