Abstract
We propose a model of hedging and investment with ambiguity aversion in an incomplete financial market. We show that the agent's worst-case belief depends upon the payoff of the derivative to be hedged. Thus, we identify situations where one can distinguish ambiguity averse agents from probabilistically sophisticated agents. Further, we generate the hypothesis: an ambiguity averse agent chooses higher volatility when hedging a derivative position whose payoff function is convex than when hedging a position whose payoff function is concave. Our model can be extended to accommodate non-iid uncertainty and jumps in the continuous time limit of the model.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have