Abstract
In this paper, we consider an online non-preemptive scheduling problem on two related machines, where at most K jobs are allowed to be rearranged, but only after all jobs have been revealed and (temporarily) scheduled. We minimize the makespan, and we call the problem as Online scheduling with bounded rearrangement at the end (BRE), which is a semi-online problem. Jobs arrive one by one over list. After all the jobs have been arrived and scheduled, we are informed that the input sequence is over; then at most K already scheduled jobs can be reassigned. With respect to the worst case ratio, we close the gap between the lower bound and upper bound, improving the previous result as well.Especially, for the lower bound, (i) for s≥2 an improved lower bound s+2s+1 is obtained, which is better than (s+1)2s2+s+1 (Liu et al. (2009) [9]); (ii) for 1+52≤s<2, an improved lower bound s2s2−s+1 is obtained, which is better than (s+1)2s2+s+1 (Liu et al. (2009) [9]). For the upper bound, (i) for s≥2 and K=1, a new upper bound s+2s+1 is obtained, which is optimal and better than the one s+1s in Liu et al. (2009) [9]; (ii) for 1+52≤s<2 and K=2, an upper bound s2s2−s+1 is proposed, which is optimal and better than the previous one s+1s in Liu et al. (2009) [9]; (iii) for s<1+52 and K=2, an upper bound (s+1)2s2+s+1 is obtained, which is also optimal and better than the previous one min{s+1s,(s+1)2s+2} in Liu et al. (2009) [9].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.