Abstract
ABSTRACTTo collect the information about the lifetime distribution of a product, a standard life testing method at normal working conditions is impractical when the product has a substantially long lifespan. Accelerated life testing solves this problem by subjecting the test units at higher stress levels for quicker and more failure data. Due to constrained resources in practice, several decision variables such as the allocation proportions and stress durations must be determined carefully at the design stage in order to run an accelerated life test efficiently. These decision variables directly affect the experimental cost as well as the estimate precision of the parameters of interest. This article investigates these optimal decision variables based on several well-known optimality criteria under the constraint that the total experimental cost does not exceed a pre-specified budget. A general scale family of distributions is considered for the underlying lifetimes to accommodate different lifetime models at different stress levels for flexible modeling. The constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests are then studied in detail with linearly decreasing stress durations as the stress level progresses. Under the identical budget constraint, the efficiencies of these two stress loading schemes are compared using two case studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.