Abstract

Head-mounted displays (HMDs) are hands-free devices particularly useful for guiding near-field tasks such as manual surgical procedures. See-through HMDs do not significantly alter the user’s direct view of the world, but the optical merging of real and virtual information can hinder their coherent and simultaneous perception. In particular, the coherence between the real and virtual content is affected by a viewpoint parallax-related misalignment, which is due to the inaccessibility of the user-perceived reality through the semi-transparent optical combiner of the OST Optical See-Through (OST) display. Recent works demonstrated that a proper selection of the collimation optics of the HMD significantly mitigates the parallax-related registration error without the need for any eye-tracking cameras and/or for any error-prone alignment-based display calibration procedures. These solutions are either based on HMDs that projects the virtual imaging plane directly at arm’s distance, or they require the integration on the HMD of additional lenses to optically move the image of the observed scene to the virtual projection plane of the HMD. This paper describes and evaluates the pros and cons of both the suggested solutions by providing an analytical estimation of the residual registration error achieved with both solutions and discussing the perceptual issues generated by the simultaneous focalization of real and virtual information.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.