Abstract
Biomass burning (BB) is an important source of brown carbon (BrC) in atmospheric aerosols. The aim of this study is to investigate the light absorbing ability and oxidative potential of BB-derived BrC fractions (including not only the water soluble fraction but the water-insoluble ones). For this purpose, BrC fractions in the smoke particles (PM2.5) generated from burning of crop residues (rice straw, wheat straw, and corn straw) and wood stems (pine wood and Chinese fir) were sequentially extracted and fractionated into water- and alkaline-soluble extracts, and water- and alkaline-soluble humic-like substances (HULISWS and HULISAS). Their organic carbon (OC) contents, light absorption, and oxidative potential were comparably investigated. The results showed that the OC within water extracts (WSOC) and alkaline extracts (ASOC), and HULISWS and HULISAS accounted for 24.8%–28.5%, 10.7%–15.3%, 12.4%–16.6%, and 2.2%–5.6% of the BB smoke PM2.5 mass, respectively, thereby indicating that BB potentially influenced the atmospheric water-soluble and alkaline-soluble BrC levels. The BrC fractions had similar absorption patterns, but they also exhibited distinct features. BrC SUVA254 decreased in the order of: HULISAS (3.68–4.58 m2/gC) > HULISWS (2.99–3.72 m2/gC) > WSOC (2.54–2.80 m2/gC) > ASOC (1.30–2.06 m2/gC). BrC MAE365 was in the order of: HULISAS (1.95–2.40 m2/gC) > HULISWS (1.12–1.60 m2/gC) > WSOC (0.86–1.23 m2/gC) and ASOC (0.54–0.95 m2/gC). These results suggest that the HULIS fractions exhibited high aromaticity and strong light absorption. Moreover, BB extractable fractions exhibited a strong oxidative potential to generate reactive oxygen species, and the dithiothreitol activity followed the order of: water extracts (12.5–20.6 pmol/min/μg) > alkaline extracts (9.3–16.2 pmol/min/μg) > HULISWS (6.6–10.7 pmol/min/μg) > HULISAS (3.7–7.1 pmol/min/μg). The chemical characteristics of the BB BrC fractions also varied among the biomass types, where the crop residue smoke PM2.5 contained more BrC than wood smoke PM2.5, but the water-soluble BrC in the former generally exhibited weaker light absorption than the latter.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.