Abstract

Traditionally, 3D digitizing sensors have been based on contact measurement. Given the disadvantages of this type of measurement, non-contact sensors such as structured light sensors have gained the attention of many sectors in recent years. The fact that their metrological performance is affected by the optical properties of the digitized material, together with the lack of standards, makes it necessary to develop characterization work to validate materials and calibration artifacts for the qualification and calibration of these sensors. This work compares and optically characterizes different materials and surface finishes of reference spheres used in the calibration of two structured light sensors with different fields of application, with the aim to determine the most suitable sphere material-sensor combination in each case. The contact measurement system of a CMM is used as a reference and, for the processing of the information from the sensors, the application of two different filters is analyzed. The results achieved point to sandblasted stainless steel spheres as the best choice for calibrating or qualifying these sensors, as well as for use as registration targets in digitizing. Tungsten carbide spheres and zirconium are unsuitable for this purpose.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.