Abstract

Symmetry is a salient aspect of biological and man-made objects, and has a central role in perceptual organization. Two studies investigate the role of opposition and identicalness in shaping adults’ naïve idea of “symmetry”. In study 1, both verbal descriptions of symmetry (either provided by the participants or selected from among alternatives presented by the experimenter) and configurations drawn as exemplars of symmetry were studied. In study 2, a pair comparison task was used. Both studies focus on configurations formed by two symmetrical shapes (i.e., between-objects symmetry). Three main results emerged. The explicit description of symmetry provided by participants generally referred to features relating to the relationship perceived between the two shapes and not to geometrical point-by-point transformations. Despite the fact that people tended to avoid references to opposition in their verbal definition of symmetry in study 1, the drawings that they did to represent their prototypical idea of symmetry manifested opposition as a basic component. This latter result was confirmed when the participants were asked to select the definition (in study 1) or the configuration (in study 2) that best fitted with their idea of symmetry. In conclusion, identicalness is an important component in people’s naïve idea of symmetry, but it does not suffice: opposition complements it.

Highlights

  • The perception of symmetry has always been an intriguing subject for psychologists

  • We studied whether the opposite orientation of the shapes was manifested or absent

  • The results of the scaling are in clear agreement with the hypothesis; the configurations showing identicalness and opposition were generally preferred asas representatives of the configurations showing identicalness and opposition were generally preferred representatives symmetry asas compared of symmetry comparedtotoconfigurations configurationsshowing showingonly onlyidenticalness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The perception of symmetry has always been an intriguing subject for psychologists (for a review, see [1,2]). Some studies have shown that the ability to detect mirror symmetry around a particular axis depends on the frequencies of various different orientations within a block of trials (e.g., [14,18]). This implies that the effect of orientation on the detection of symmetry is not completely determined by a fixed neural architecture in the visual system but can be modulated by scanning or attentional strategies. These findings do not negate the aforementioned preference for bilateral symmetry around a vertical axis, they indicate that it may be necessary to adjust the Symmetry 2017, 9, 128; doi:10.3390/sym9080128 www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry world and ofregarding artifacts isthe predominantly around a vertical axis, the for this type of hypotheses causes of the bilateral phenomena

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call