Abstract

Amid the euphoria of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and REDD+ discussions, the expectations of large financial gains raise the interest of all. A country, however, will only enjoy REDD benefits if the cost of REDD is lower than the benefit. The opportunity cost analysis is an effective tool for assessing the feasibility of REDD+ since the largest portion of costs associated with REDD+ and can help to identify fair compensation for those who change their land use. The opportunity cost analysis has been exercised in Tanjung Jabung Barat (Tanjabar) district-Indonesia to examine the economic-feasibility of carbon emission reduction under different type carbon price scenarios. This study reveals a sharp decline of land-use systems with high carbon-stock and low profitability is obvious. On mineral soil, low carbon-stock and high profitability (mostly oil palm) has increased rapidly, especially in the period 2000-2009. It has become the dominant land-use system. The low-to-medium carbon stock and medium profitability land-use category increased from 1990 to 2005 but declined from 2005 to 2009. The low carbon-stock and low profitability category was constant and the proportion of the area was below 15%. The ex-ante analysis in predicting the potential for future emissions reduction in Tanjabar through REDD+ approaches shows that the cumulative emission of Tanjabar in 2020 is estimated at 61.91 Mg CO2-eq/Ha.Year, while the reduced emission by excluding all land use conversion below $5 threshold is estimated at 51.71 Mg CO2-eq/Ha.Year. This means that there is a potential for 16% emission reduction using $5/ton CO2-eq incentive. Another important finding in this study is that if the price of carbon increases by double to $10, the amount of reduced emission does not change much. This can use as a basis for determining the right amount of incentive for trade-off between economic profitability and climate change mitigation effort in Tanjabar using REDD+ scheme both at seller and buyer perspectives.

Highlights

  • Amid the euphoria of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and REDD+ discussions, the expectations of large financial gains raise the interest of all

  • The method used in this study followed the manual for estimating the opportunity cost of REDD+ published by the World Bank Institute and the REDD-Abacus software developed by the World Agroforestry Centre (Harja et al, 2011)

  • Cumulative emission of Tanjabar in 2020 is estimated at 61.91 Mg CO2-eq/Ha.Year, while the reduced emission by excluding all land use conversion below $5 threshold is estimated at 51.71 Mg CO2-eq/Ha.Year. This means that there is a potential for 16% emission reduction using $5/ton CO2-eq incentive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Amid the euphoria of REDD and REDD+ discussions, the expectations of large financial gains raise the interest of all. This expectation seems reasonable as indicating by the value of REDD projects that reached USD 87 million and A/R projects USD 65 million in 2011, and where transaction volume reached significantly to 7.3 MtCO2e for REDD projects and 7.6 MtCO2e for A/R projects (Ecosystem Marketplace & Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2012). REDD+ emerges as promising incentive mechanism for tropical forest protection (Huettner, 2011) Such effort requires sustained financial incentives, which go beyond positive incentives for reduced emissions and give incentives for sustainable forest management (Mollicone et al, 2007). A country will only enjoy REDD benefits if the cost of REDD is lower than the benefit. White and Minang (2011) grouped the cost into three categories as follow (1) Opportunity cost (2) Implementation cost and (3) Transaction cost

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call