Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Lung Cancer Resection: A Case-Control Study

Abstract

To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) technique in lung cancer resection surgery versus standard opioid-based techniques. Retrospective, propensity-matched, case-control study. A single, specialty cardiothoracic center between January 2018 and July 2019. Adult patients undergoing lung cancer resection surgery. A cohort of 83 patients undergoing an OFA technique (OFA group) for lung cancer resection surgery was matched with 83 patients who underwent similar surgery with a standard anesthesia technique (STD group). Outcome measures compared between the 2 groups included postoperative pain scores at 0, 1, and 24 hours; 24-hour postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia consumption; recovery room and hospital lengths of stay; and 30-day all-cause mortality. No difference was found in median pain scores (interquartile range [IQR]) at 0 hours: STD 0 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.48. Median pain scores (IQR) at 1 hour were statistically significantly greater in the STD group compared with the OFA group: STD 1 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.03. There was no difference in median pain scores (IQR) at 24 hours: STD 0 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.49. Mean postoperative 24-hour patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption (standard deviation) was similar between groups: STD 21.1 (±18.8) mg, OFA 16.2 (±18.1) mg; p = 0.16. There was no difference in mean time spent in the postoperative recovery (standard deviation) area between the 2 groups: STD 116 (±49) minutes, OFA 108 (±34) minutes; p = 0.27. Median hospital length of stay (IQR) was longer in the STD group compared with the OFA group: STD 4 (2-6) days, OFA 3 (2-4) days; p = 0.002. This case-control study demonstrated that an OFA technique in lung cancer resection surgery offers a feasible and safe approach, resulting in similar postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption compared with standard opioid-containing techniques.