Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Management of Distal Tibia Extra-Articular Fracture (Mini Thesis)

Abstract

Abstract Background Extra-articular distal tibia fracture is one of the difficult fractures to treat and the optimal treatment remains controversial, however plates seem to be the obvious choice for treating this type of fractures. The mechanism on how to achieve the balance between anatomic reduction and indirect reduction as well as direct and indirect healing remains unclear. Thus, the key point is whether to use ORIF or MIPO in treating fractures. Aim of the Work to provide a complete overview of the optimal plating technique for distal tibia fractures by evaluating and comparing the clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) vs Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for treating extra- articular distal tibial fractures. Outcomes of interest include operation time, time to union, non-union, mal-union, infection, secondary operations, and functional outcomes (AOFAS score). Patients and Methods From August 2020 to August 2021, a prospective randomized study was conducted at the department of orthopedic surgery of Ain-shams University Hospital including 36 patients to compare MIPO vs. ORIF in fixation of extra-articular distal tibial fractures. The patients were allotted to the MIPO or ORIF group with the flip of a coin. Results Regarding complications rate, no cases developed infection in MIPO technique. On the other hand, the ORIF technique had an infection incidence of 16.6% overall, with two cases (11.11 %) developing superficial infection and one case (5.56 %) developing deep infection. There was no significant difference in the incidence of mal-union between both techniques with no cases of non-union in both groups. The MIPO group had only one case of sagittal plane malunion (5.56%), compared with no cases in the ORIF group. There was no significant difference between both groups in secondary operations rate, with one case in each group. Conclusion Both MIPO and ORIF have similar therapeutic efficacy regarding the functional outcome and can be used safely in distal tibial extra-articular fractures. Although MIPO is advantageous over ORIF with earlier weight-bearing, earlier union, and clinical lower incidence of infection, it has delayed operation time.