Abstract

Korean oil and gas contractors have recently incurred significant losses due to improper engineering performance on EPC (engineering procurement and construction) projects in overseas markets. Several previous studies have verified the significant impact engineering has on EPC construction cost and project lifecycle. However, no literature has studied the time impact engineering has on EPC projects, representing a gap in the existing body of knowledge. To fill this gap, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed with the Pertmaster, Primavera risk analysis software for three sample onshore oil and gas projects. From said simulation of all major EPC critical activities, the authors found that the engineering phase is up to 10 times as impactful as the procurement and construction phases on the overall schedule duration. In assessing the engineering activities, the authors found the piping design activities to have the greatest impact on the overall schedule performance. Using these findings, the authors present a design schedule management process which minimizes the delays of project completion in EPC projects. Said process includes the following six steps: (1) Milestone management, (2) drawing status management, (3) productivity management of engineering, (4) interface management, (5) management of major vendor documents, and (6) work front management. The findings of this paper add to the body of knowledge by confirming the design phase to be the most impactful on the overall project schedule success. Furthermore, the presented design schedule management will aid industry with successfully executing the design phase in a timely manner, including examples from case study projects for a greater understanding.

Highlights

  • The Korean oil and gas industry has suffered significant market difficulties recently due to a multitude of reasons

  • This study analyzed the impact the engineering phase has on the success of EPC projects

  • To ascertain which stage of the EPC affects the project schedule most, the research team delayed the critical activities of engineering, procurement, and construction for 2, 10, 30, and 60 days, recording the estimated impact on the project completion date, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Korean oil and gas industry has suffered significant market difficulties recently due to a multitude of reasons. Korean oil and gas contractors have experienced a loss in profitability due to project management issues caused by executing Engineer, Procure, and Construct (EPC) megaprojects. This has mainly included inefficiencies of the project management system, errors in the design phase, and inefficiency of logistics management due to vendor departure. Many EPC projects are fast-tracked with detailed design, procurement, and construction occurring concurrently. The detailed design cannot be achieved properly, often damaging the project via schedule and/or cost impacts. This paper identifies the most impactful activities, developing a design management system to maximize engineering resources and minimize delays

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call