Abstract
AbstractSome fake online reviews may have overlapping textual features with authentic reviews. This paper explores the nuanced differences between helpful and unhelpful reviews, as well as fake and authentic reviews. Four textual features—polarity, subjectivity, readability, and depth—are used for the investigation. Results suggest that subjectivity, readability and depth help to distinguish between helpful and unhelpful reviews but not between fake and authentic ones. However, polarity offers a clue to differentiate between helpful fake and helpful authentic reviews. Specifically, for positive entries, helpful fake reviews contain more contents indicative of surprise while helpful authentic had more expectation-confirmed words like satisfaction. For negative entries, helpful fake reviews contained more contents indicative of anger while authentic helpful ones carried more anxiety.KeywordsAuthentic online reviewsFake online reviewsReview helpfulness
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
