Abstract
Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) uses daily imaging to identify changes in the patient's anatomy and generate a new treatment plan adapted to these changes, and it can be used for treating gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. This study aimed to determine the intrafraction motion and planning target volume (PTV) margins required for an oART workflow on a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based dedicated system (Ethos®, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, United States) and investigate the potential benefits for patients compared with a non-adaptive workflow. Involving three patients treated for gastric MALT lymphoma with the oART under breath-hold (BH) technique, the study determined a PTV margin for adaptive treatment using CBCT scans performed at the beginning and just before treating the patients for 34 fractions. Different PTVs were made by isotropically extending the clinical target volume (CTV) contoured on the first CBCT (CTV1) at intervals of 1 mm to evaluate intrafraction gastric motion, with the expansion covering the contoured CTV on the second CBCT (CTV2) quantifying the intrafraction motion (adaptive treatment) and the expansion from the CTV delineated on the planning scanner (CTVplanning) that could cover both CTV1 and CTV2 defining the interfraction motion (non-adaptive treatment). PTV margins were then determined as the extension of the CTV allowing coverage of 95% of its volume in 90% of fractions, and the dosimetric impact on dose constraints between an adaptive plan and a non-adaptive plan based on the predetermined margins was evaluated. A total of 68 CBCTs were analyzed, revealing that the PTV margin for oART was 4 mm, while for non-adaptive treatment it was 12 mm, with an average time elapsed between CBCT1 and CBCT2 of 11.62 minutes and no correlation between inter-CBCT timing and PTV margins (Pearson R-coefficient=0.10). All dosimetric constraints were met in both adaptive and non-adaptive plans, but the adaptive plan allowed for reduced organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in each patient. The study concluded that oART could reduce PTV margins in the treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma, especially with a BH strategy, impacting OAR dosimetry, though more prospective studies are required to validate these findings and determine their clinical impact on patients.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call