Abstract
Conclusions We conclude that the quadratic Euclidian normalization is superior to the linear Cartesian normalization as a candidate for the length restriction (3) in the statement of the auxiliary problem. The method of solution using Norm II is clearly more efficient than the methods based on Norm I, and has the additional advantage of introducing no bias. It is particularly noteworthy that Method II run times are primarily a function of the number of active constraints only, while Methods IA and IB run times increase significantly with increase in either m or n. References
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call