Abstract

In correspondence analysis (CA), the rows and columns of a contingency table are optimally represented in a k-dimensional approximation, where it is common to set k=3 (which includes a so-called trivial dimension). Since CA is a dimension reduction technique, we might expect that the k-dimensional approximation is not unique, i.e. there exist several contingency tables with the same k-dimensional approximation. Interestingly, Van de Velden et al. [17] find in their computational experiments that 3-dimensional CA solutions are unique up to rotation, which leads to the question whether this is always the case. We show that k-dimensional CA solutions are not necessarily unique. That is, two distinct contingency tables may have the same k-dimensional approximation. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for the non-uniqueness of CA solutions, which hold for any value of k. Based on our sufficient conditions, we present a procedure to generate contingency tables with the same k-dimensional solution. Finally, we note that it is difficult to satisfy the necessary conditions, which suggests that CA solutions are most likely unique in practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call