Abstract
The interpretation of multiplicative noise in a stochastic differential equation in the context of data-driven inverse modeling is discussed. Application to the well-known paleoclimate phenomenon of Dansgaard–Oeschger events leads to qualitatively different ‘climate potentials’ in the case of the Itô or the Stratonovich interpretation of the stochastic integral. While a physical model is endowed with an interpretation from construction, whether implicitly or explicitly, inverse models derived from data do not afford such a luxury. In this case, a physical model must accompany the mathematical model equation in order to be able to choose a stochastic interpretation. This case study illustrates the differences between the two representations of stochastic noise and demonstrates the need for input from physical constraints when constructing conceptual stochastic models of the observed climate records.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.