On the real meaning of Bell's theorem

Abstract

In the last couple of years many important results have been derived showing that Bell's inequalities are nothing else but the indicator of whether certain events and their probabilities can be represented within a Kolmogorovian probabilistic model. It has become evident that one can derive Bell's inequalities without mentioning locality, causality, hidden variables, etc. Many authors jumped to the conclusion that the original content of Bell's theorem had lost its meaning. I reconsider the original problem posed by Bell and I show that Bell's theorem is still valid.