Abstract
In the last couple of years many important results have been derived showing that Bell's inequalities are nothing else but the indicator whether certain events and their probabilities can be represented or not within a Kolmogorovian probabilistic model. It has become evident that one can derive the Bell's inequalities without mentioning locality, causality hidden variable, etc. Many authors jumped to conclusion that the original content of the Bell's theorem had lost its meaning. I reconsider original problem posed by Bell and I show that the Bell's theorem is still valid.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
