Abstract

In three studies, heterosexual participants were presented with descriptions of heterosexual and gay-male parents. Importantly, the level of gender-role conformity of the gay-male parents was experimentally manipulated, resulting in their level of gender-role conformity ranging from high to low. Compared to the son of a heterosexual couple, the son of all gay-male couples had a lower expected likelihood of developing as heterosexual. This result was independent of the level of gender-role conformity of the gay-male couples (study 1–3). The beliefs about the gender-role development of the son, in terms of anticipated masculinity (study 1), gender stereotyping (study 2), and affective adjustment (study 3), mapped onto the level of gender-role conformity of the parents, regardless of their sexual orientation. Also, heterosexual parents were consistently judged more positively than gay-male parents, independently of their level of gender-role conformity (study 1–3). Results were discussed within the theoretical framework of stereotypes about gay-male parenting.

Highlights

  • Several studies have addressed the interplay between sexual orientation and gender-role conformity information on the evaluation and stereotyping of gay and lesbian individuals (e.g., Hunt et al 2016; Salvati et al 2016)

  • Participants stereotyped the son as masculine in the heterosexual parent description, and this level of gender stereotyping did not differ from the GMM and GMF parent description

  • The son was anticipated as more likely to develop as heterosexual if raised by heterosexual parents than by gay-male parents, and no differences existed between the different gay-male parents description in terms of this variable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several studies have addressed the interplay between sexual orientation and gender-role conformity information on the evaluation and stereotyping of gay and lesbian individuals (e.g., Hunt et al 2016; Salvati et al 2016). Research conducted on Italian samples and in a cross-cultural design has demonstrated that the endorsement of religious beliefs and being politically conservative, among other factors, contribute to sexual prejudice (Lingiardi et al 2016; Worthen, Lingiardi and Caristo 2017) Differently to other EU countries, same-sex civil partnerships, but not same-sex parenting rights, were legally recognized in Italy in 2016. This cultural context represents a fertile ground for our investigation. We assessed the anticipated gender-role conformity of the son by using different measures, such as the expected gender-role development (i.e., the extent to which the son would develop to be masculine), the anticipated gender stereotyping (e.g., the extent to which the son would prefer to play football [vs. being interested in fashion]), and the anticipated psychological adjustment on gender-stereotypical dimensions (e.g., affective development)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call