Abstract
AbstractIdeally, the score vectors numerically computed by an orthogonal scores partial least squares (PLS) algorithm should be orthogonal close to machine precision. However, this is not ensured without taking special precautions. The progressive loss of orthogonality with increasing number of components is illustrated for two widely used PLS algorithms, i.e., one that can be considered as a standard PLS algorithm, and SIMPLS. It is shown that the original standard PLS algorithm outperforms the original SIMPLS in terms of numerical stability. However, SIMPLS is confirmed to perform much better in terms of speed. We have investigated reorthogonalization as the special precaution to ensure orthogonality close to machine precision. Since the increase of computing time is relatively small for SIMPLS, we therefore recommend SIMPLS with reorthogonalization. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.