Abstract
In this paper the dynamics of human running on flat terrain and the required mechanical power output with its dependency on various parameters is investigated. Knowing the required mechanical power output is of relevance due to its relationship with the metabolic power. For example, a better understanding of the dependencies of required mechanical power output on weight, running and wind speed, step frequency, ground contact time etc. is very valuable for the assessment, analysis and optimization of running performance. Therefore, a mathematical model based on very few assumptions is devised. The purpose of the proposed model is to relate running speed and required mechanical power output as an algebraic function of the runner’s mass, height, step rate, ground contact time and wind speed. This is relevant in order to better understand the mechanical energy cost of locomotion, and how much it depends on which parameters. The first of the main energy dissipation mechanisms is due to vertical oscillation, i.e., during each step some of the potential energy difference gets transformed into heat. The second mechanism is due to the anterior ground reaction force during the first part of stance and the third is due to aerodynamic drag. With the approximations of constant running speed and a sinusoidal vertical ground reaction force profile one obtains closed algebraic expressions for the center of mass trajectory and the required mechanical power output. Comparisons of model predictions and reported performance data suggest that approximately a quarter of the ground impact energy is stored during the first part of ground contact and then released during the remaining stance phase. Further, one can conclude from the model that less mechanical power output is required when running with higher step rates and a higher center of mass. Non intuitive is the result that a shorter ground contact time is beneficial for fast runs, while the opposite holds for slow runs. An important advantage of the devised model compared to others is that it leads to closed algebraic expressions for the center of mass trajectory and mechanical power output, which are functions of measurable quantities, i.e., of step rate, ground contact time, running speed, runner’s mass, center of mass height, aerodynamic drag at some given speed, wind speed and heart rate. Moreover, the model relies on very few assumptions, which have been verified, and the only tuning parameter is the ratio of recovered elastic energy.
Highlights
Besides walking, running is the most flexible form of human mobility
The mathematical model is presented in Section 2; first, an expression for the center of mass trajectory is derived as function of running speed, step rate and ground contact time; an expression for the required mechanical power output is derived, whereas energy dissipation due to vertical oscillation, anterior ground reaction force and aerodynamic drag are discussed separately
The model shows that at a speed of 3 m/s vertical oscillation is responsible for approximately 50% of total energy dissipation, but for only about 17% at a speed of 6 m/s
Summary
Besides walking, running is the most flexible form of human mobility. Its flexibility, comes at the cost of a relatively high energy demand, e.g. when compared with cycling on a paved road. While there exist established differential equations describing the center of mass (COM) dynamics (Blickhan, 1989), no algebraic model which relates running speed and mechanical power output as a function of mass, step rate and ground contact time has been devised yet. The COM dynamics and average mechanical power output requirement of human running on flat terrain are quantitatively analyzed in pure mechanical terms as functions of the runner’s mass, his height, step rate, ground contact time and wind speed. The mathematical model is presented in Section 2; first, an expression for the center of mass trajectory is derived as function of running speed, step rate and ground contact time; an expression for the required mechanical power output is derived, whereas energy dissipation due to vertical oscillation, anterior ground reaction force and aerodynamic drag are discussed separately.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have