Abstract

In a recent publication on ‘Cityness and African Urban Development’, Edgar Pieterse calls for a suspension of the ‘humanist safety net’ that frequently underpins policy prescriptions in most liberal (and social-liberal) democracies. While I support Pieterse’s call, this paper sets out to demonstrate why it is difficult for most planners to suspend, let alone reject, the ‘liberal moral project of planning’. To this end, the role of planning is reassessed by focusing on some of the entrenched liberal legacies in South Africa. Findings spotlight how mainstream practices are directed towards serving ‘the public interest’ through a liberal calculus of public morality and obligations; and I propose that before planners might begin to engage with Pieterse’s project, we first need to challenge the current norms of planning.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.