Abstract

With the development of science and technology, insurance fraud is not uncommon, but my country's legal remedies for this are not clear. This article first explains the concept of insurance fraud and compares and analyzes the difference between the insurer’s right of rescission and revocation, and summarizes the current application dilemmas of the two rights. Next, the author analyzes the preconditions for the insurer to exercise the right of termination according to the law to distinguish the two rights again, and then introduces the current thinking dimensions of scholars from the two mainstream viewpoints of "exclusion of application theory" and "selection application theory". At the same time Combining with extraterritorial regulations and summarizing the advanced experience that our country can learn from, the author finally puts forward suggestions on regulating the application of the insurer's right of cancellation and cancellation from the subjective aspects of the insurant and the insurer in anticipation of resolving the dilemma of the conflict of rights.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.