Abstract

The article deals with the topical problem of determining the limits of the cross-complex non-Supervisory direction of the Prosecutor's activity for the protection of public interest in the sphere of use and protection of specially protected natural territories (hereinafter – protected areas). In accordance with the law, protection is provided by the Prosecutor in all types of legal proceedings – constitutional, criminal, civil, arbitration, administrative, including proceedings on administrative offences. The precise definition of the limits of the Prosecutor's activity under study is necessary for the formation of a unified approach to the optimal organisation of work, the implementation of all the powers granted to the Prosecutor and the selection of adequate means of prosecutorial response for effective judicial protection of public interest in the use and protection of protected areas. The author analyses the provisions of Federal legislation and organisational and administrative documents of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, scientists’ points of view on the content of external and internal limits of Prosecutor's supervision and non-Supervisory areas of Prosecutor's activity, available in the literature. Based on the research, the author draws conclusions about the limits of this activity, and she offers a list of grounds on which the protection of public interest is carried out exclusively in court.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.