On the interpretation of Feynman diagrams, or, did the LHC experiments observe H → γγ?

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

According to the received view Feynman diagrams are a bookkeeping device in complex perturbative calculations. Thus, they do not provide a representation or model of the underlying physical process. This view is in apparent tension with scientific practice in high energy physics, which analyses its data in terms of `channels'. For example the Higgs discovery was based on the observation of the decay $H \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ -- a process which can be easily represented by the corresponding Feynman diagrams. I take issue with this tension and show that on closer analysis the story of the Higgs discovery should be told differently.