Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the question of whether and how perspective taking at the linguistic level interacts with perspective taking at the level of co-speech gestures. In an experimental rating study, we compared test items clearly expressing the perspective of an individual participating in the event described by the sentence with test items which clearly express the speaker’s or narrator’s perspective. Each test item was videotaped in two different versions: In one version, the speaker performed a co-speech gesture in which she enacted the event described by the sentence from a participant’s point of view (i.e. with a character viewpoint gesture). In the other version, she performed a co-speech gesture depicting the event described by the sentence as if it was observed from a distance (i.e. with an observer viewpoint gesture). Both versions of each test item were shown to participants who then had to decide which of the two versions they find more natural. Based on the experimental results we argue that there is no general need for perspective taking on the linguistic level to be aligned with perspective taking on the gestural level. Rather, there is clear preference for the more informative gesture.

Highlights

  • Perspective taking is an integral part of the information conveyed by sentences that are contained in narrative texts

  • In Free Indirect Discourse and Demonstrative pronouns as anti-logophoric pronouns. we provide some theoretical background on FID and the antilogophoricity of German demonstrative pronouns, respectively, and in Observer viewpoint and character viewpoint gestures on CVGs and observer viewpoint gestures (OVG)

  • Having discussed perspective taking on the linguistic level, on the level of co-speech gestures, as well as their relationship, we will discuss an experimental study in which we systematically investigated the interaction of the two kinds of perspective taking in light of our assumptions concerning perspectival coherence in The experimental study (see Ebert and Hinterwimmer to appear for a study of selfpointing CVGs in reported speech vs. direct speech vs. FID and a proposal to account for such and other demonstrations in quotation on basis of Ebert et al (2020) account for cospeech gestures)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Perspective taking is an integral part of the information conveyed by sentences that are contained in narrative texts. Free Indirect Discourse (FID) is a clear way for a sentence to express the perspective of a protagonist in a narrative text. The proposition denoted by a sentence in FID is interpreted as a thought or utterance that the respective protagonist has or makes at the reference time of the ongoing story (Eckardt 2014). The second sentence in (1), for instance, which is a clear instance of FID, is interpreted as a thought that Masha has at the time of her staring at Wilfred–the same thought as the one rendered as direct discourse in (1b)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call