Abstract

Warlpiri and Warlmanpa (Ngumpin-Yapa languages of Australia) exhibit a complex predicate construction in which a class of preverbs introduces a single argument that is not shared by the argument structure of the inflecting verb, nor is there necessarily any shared event structure. This is problematic for many theories of linking structures of complex predicates, since no arguments or events are shared between the predicative elements of the complex predicate. The same grammatical relation is instantiated by a beneficiary adjunct. In light of new research in event and argument structure, I propose a lexical rule which introduces an applicative argument to account for the beneficiary construction; and that the preverbs take another predicate as one of their arguments to account for the complex predicates. The applicative rule and the preverbs both introduce an argument of the same grammatical relation, leading to interesting interactions, given that two grammatical relations of the same type are not expected to co-occur within a single clause.

Highlights

  • This paper investigates a particular grammatical relation, referred to as ‘external object’, found in two Australian languages, Warlpiri and Warlmanpa

  • This paper has built on the analysis of external objects in Warlpiri by Simpson (1991), utilising recent innovations in predication, and extending the analysis to Warlmanpa, representing the first formal analysis of preverb + inflecting verb combinations and external objects in Warlmanpa

  • Both the ‘ethical dative’ external objects and the external objects constrained by preverbs are optional

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper investigates a particular grammatical relation, referred to as ‘external object’, found in two Australian languages, Warlpiri and Warlmanpa. This grammatical relation can be introduced to a clause in two ways. Nonfinite subordinate clauses utilise the nominal case system (and dedicated complementising suffixes) to mark constituents of the subordinate clause (Austin 1981; Simpson 1988) Both languages have a small inventory of inflecting verbs: 45 inflecting verbs are reported in Warlmanpa (Browne 2021), and approximately 130 are reported in Warlpiri (Nash 2008). Preverbs bear the main semantic load of predication, if present, and there are significantly more preverbs than inflecting verbs in both languages

Simpson’s ‘External Object’
The Framework
Incorporating External Objects into Event Structure
The Dative Case?
Applicatives
Complex Predicates
Interactions between Applicatives and External Object Preverbs
Multiple External Objects
Preverb Variation
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call