On the History of Vocabulary Study of Kipchak Languages Group

Lyazat Meirambekova,Magripa Yeskeyeva,Gulgaisha Sagidolda,Tleules Abdygalieva,Karlygash Sarekenova

doi:10.3844/ajassp.2016.1184.1192

Lyazat Meirambekova, Magripa Yeskeyeva + Show 3 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.1184.1192

Copy DOI

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of the development and formation process of the written Turkic languages from the beginning of the XX century. The research is based on the construction of separate lexicology of Turkic languages on the materials of Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Bashkir, Kumyk, Nogai and Tatar languages. The general lexicological fund of Turkic languages is investigated. The national written traditions of the Turkic speakers' nations, their vocabulary and lexicology formation, the period of their literary national language development are analyzed. Some examples are provided in the given article.

Highlights

In the 21th century the modernization spread broadly in the sphere of informational technology of Turkic nations’ cultural relation
The use of these research methods is conditioned by the study of information on separate languages lexicology of Kazakh language, the lexicology of Kyrgyz, Bashkir, Tatar languages
In the lexical research such languages as Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Bashkir, Kumyk, Nogai and Tatar written languages have taken their root from the outstanding work on Turkic nationslanguages, which is written in the XI century by Makhmud Kashgarys «Diuani lugat at-Turik» dictionary

Summary

Introduction

In the 21th century the modernization spread broadly in the sphere of informational technology of Turkic nations’ cultural relation. It has great significance to prove the difference in Turkic languages' lexical fund and the impact of modern social changes on Turkic languages These important problems are investigating in the field of comparative-synchronous vocabulary construction. On the basis of information on separate languages lexicology of Kazakh language, the lexicology of Kyrgyz, Bashkir, Tatar languages prove that, there is a need to investigate general lexicological fund of Turkic languages. We would like to focus on the word formation of modern Kipchak languages group, namely Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Bashkir, Kumyk, Nogai and Tatar languages. Their modern situations are highlighting the scientific and theoretical significance of this paper

Material and Methods of the Research

Findings

Discussion

Conclusion