Abstract

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has become an invaluable tool to assess the microstructural organization of brain tissue. Depending on the specific acquisition settings, the dMRI signal encodes specific properties of the underlying diffusion process. In the last two decades, several signal representations have been proposed to fit the dMRI signal and decode such properties. Most methods, however, are tested and developed on a limited amount of data, and their applicability to other acquisition schemes remains unknown. With this work, we aimed to shed light on the generalizability of existing dMRI signal representations to different diffusion encoding parameters and brain tissue types. To this end, we organized a community challenge - named MEMENTO, making available the same datasets for fair comparisons across algorithms and techniques. We considered two state-of-the-art diffusion datasets, including single-diffusion-encoding (SDE) spin-echo data from a human brain with over 3820 unique diffusion weightings (the MASSIVE dataset), and double (oscillating) diffusion encoding data (DDE/DODE) of a mouse brain including over 2520 unique data points. A subset of the data sampled in 5 different voxels was openly distributed, and the challenge participants were asked to predict the remaining part of the data. After one year, eight participant teams submitted a total of 80 signal fits. For each submission, we evaluated the mean squared error, the variance of the prediction error and the Bayesian information criteria. The received submissions predicted either multi-shell SDE data (37%) or DODE data (22%), followed by cartesian SDE data (19%) and DDE (18%). Most submissions predicted the signals measured with SDE remarkably well, with the exception of low and very strong diffusion weightings. The prediction of DDE and DODE data seemed more challenging, likely because none of the submissions explicitly accounted for diffusion time and frequency. Next to the choice of the model, decisions on fit procedure and hyperparameters play a major role in the prediction performance, highlighting the importance of optimizing and reporting such choices. This work is a community effort to highlight strength and limitations of the field at representing dMRI acquired with trending encoding schemes, gaining insights into how different models generalize to different tissue types and fiber configurations over a large range of diffusion encodings.

Highlights

  • Diffusion sequences which further vary the gradient waveform within one measurement, such as double diffusion encoding (DDE) (Henriques et al, 2020, Mitra, 1995) or b-tensor encoding approaches (Lasic et al, 2014; Westin et al, 2016), have been gaining interest as they can further improve the specificity of the measurements towards the underlying tissue microstructure

  • The prediction of data at b = 4000 s/mm2 was overall accurate in white matter (WM), but showed a small and consistent over-estimation in deep gray matter (DGM) and gray matter (GM)

  • The signal measured at low diffusion weightings (i.e. b < 200 s/mm2) was on average accurately predicted in the WM voxel containing up to 2 crossing fibers and in deep gray matter, but not in the complex WM-configuration (Signal 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI) is a powerful tool to investigate microstructural properties of biologic tissues in-vivo (Alexander et al, 2007; Tournier et al, 2011) with applications in neuroimaging studying brain development (Ouyang et al, 2019), plasticity (Blumenfeld-Katzir et al, 2011), aging (Baker et al, 2014), as well as changes upon disease for diagnostic and monitoring purposes in various conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (Doan et al, 2017, Weston et al, 2015), multiple sclerosis (De Santis et al, 2019, Inglese and Bester, 2010), Parkinson’s disease (Atkinson-Clement et al, 2017), brain tumours (Costabile et al, 2019), etc. In the majority of SDE acquisitions δ and Δ are fixed and G is varied to change the b-value, varying the gradient duration and diffusion time can provide additional orthogonal measurements (Novikov et al, 2019). Diffusion sequences which further vary the gradient waveform within one measurement, such as double diffusion encoding (DDE) (Henriques et al, 2020, Mitra, 1995) or b-tensor encoding approaches (Lasic et al, 2014; Westin et al, 2016), have been gaining interest as they can further improve the specificity of the measurements towards the underlying tissue microstructure. While the majority of recent dMRI studies employ SDE sequences, such advanced acquisitions are steadily gaining popularity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.