Abstract
In this paper, we study the descriptive set theoretic complexity of the equivalence relation of conjugacy of Toeplitz subshifts of a residually finite group G. On the one hand, we show that if G = Z, then topological conjugacy on Toeplitz subshifts with separated holes is amenable. In contrast, if G is non-amenable, then conjugacy of Toeplitz G-subshifts is a non-amenable equivalence relation. The results were motivated by a general question, asked by Gao, Jackson and Seward, about the complexity of conjugacy for minimal, free subshifts of countable groups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have