Abstract

In this paper, we study the descriptive set theoretic complexity of the equivalence relation of conjugacy of Toeplitz subshifts of a residually finite group G. On the one hand, we show that if G = Z, then topological conjugacy on Toeplitz subshifts with separated holes is amenable. In contrast, if G is non-amenable, then conjugacy of Toeplitz G-subshifts is a non-amenable equivalence relation. The results were motivated by a general question, asked by Gao, Jackson and Seward, about the complexity of conjugacy for minimal, free subshifts of countable groups.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call