On the accuracy of Tier 4 simulations to predict RF heating of wire implants during magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T.

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) access remains conditional to patients with conductive medical implants, as RF heating generated around the implant during scanning may cause tissue burns. Experiments have been traditionally used to assess this heating, but they are time-consuming and expensive, and in many cases cannot faithfully replicate the in-vivo scenario. Alternatively, ISO TS 10974 outlines a four-tier RF heating assessment approach based on a combination of experiments and full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulations with varying degrees of complexity. From these, Tier 4 approach relies entirely on EM simulations. There are, however, very few studies validating such numerical models against direct thermal measurements. In this work, we evaluated the agreement between simulated and measured RF heating around wire implants during RF exposure at 63.6 MHz (proton imaging at 1.5 T). Heating was assessed around wire implants with 25 unique trajectories within an ASTM phantom. The root mean square percentage error (RMSPE) of simulated vs. measured RF heating remained <1.6% despite the wide range of observed heating (0.2 °C-53 °C). Our results suggest that good agreement can be achieved between experiments and simulations as long as important experimental features such as characteristics of the MRI RF coil, implant's geometry, position, and trajectory, as well as electric and thermal properties of gel are closely mimicked in simulations.Clinical Relevance- This work validates the application of full-wave EM simulations for modeling and predicting RF heating of conductive wires in an MRI environment, providing researchers with a validated tool to assess MRI safety in patients with implants.