Abstract

AbstractLet $$\mathcal {F}$$ F and $$\mathcal {K}$$ K be commuting $$C^\infty $$ C ∞ diffeomorphisms of the cylinder $$\mathbb {T}\times \mathbb {R}$$ T × R that are, respectively, close to $$\mathcal {F}_0 (x, y)=(x+\omega (y), y)$$ F 0 ( x , y ) = ( x + ω ( y ) , y ) and $$T_\alpha (x, y)=(x+\alpha , y)$$ T α ( x , y ) = ( x + α , y ) , where $$\omega (y)$$ ω ( y ) is non-degenerate and $$\alpha $$ α is Diophantine. Using the KAM iterative scheme for the group action we show that $$\mathcal {F}$$ F and $$\mathcal {K}$$ K are simultaneously $$C^\infty $$ C ∞ -linearizable if $$\mathcal {F}$$ F has the intersection property (including the exact symplectic maps) and $$\mathcal {K}$$ K satisfies a semi-conjugacy condition. We also provide examples showing necessity of these conditions. As a consequence, we get local rigidity of certain class of $$\mathbb {Z}^2$$ Z 2 -actions on the cylinder, generated by commuting twist maps.

Highlights

  • The goal of this paper is to study the simultaneous linearization problem for some commuting nearly integrable C∞ diffeomorphisms of the cylinder

  • The phase spaces of F0 and Tα are completely foliated by smooth invariant circles, on which the dynamics are conjugate to the rigid rotations

  • Denote by Diff∞ 0 (T × R) the set of C∞ diffeomorphisms of the infinite cylinder T × R that are homotopic to the identity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The goal of this paper is to study the simultaneous linearization problem for some commuting nearly integrable C∞ diffeomorphisms of the cylinder. We are interested in the local rigidity aspect of F0 and Tα, i.e., the preservation of smooth foliations under small perturbations In the higher dimensional case, the local rigidity for commuting diffeomorphisms (close to the torus translations) of Td was obtained in [28] for d = 2 and in [5,27,34] for d ≥ 2, by assuming an appropriate Diophantine condition on the rotation sets. One finds that G1 is of the form (1.1), and G2 ◦ G−1 1 is a small perturbation of the translation map Tα2−α1 , so it is of the form (1.2) It reduces to the simultaneous linearization problem of commuting diffeomorphisms F and K given in (1.1)–(1.2)

Statement of results
Remarks on our assumptions and method
Structure of this paper
An example of non-integrable commuting diffeomorphisms
Preliminaries
Initial reduction
Linearized conjugacy equations
The commutativity property
Smoothing operators
Inductive lemma and the error estimates
Construction of h
C0-norm estimates of the new errors
The KAM iterative scheme

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.