Abstract
Law's Empire will shape jurisprudence by its admirably resourceful attention to understanding a community's law internally. It promotes reflective understanding of practical argumentation constitutive of attitude in which that law subsists. But book neglects some of practical understanding's resources of political and moral theory, and overestimates practical reasoning's power to identify options as best and right. Interpretation according to Ronald Dworkin is to be understood on model of purpose, practical reasoning, and intention. This understanding lends power and illumination to his account of interpretative attitude and its role in and in relation to law. Law's Empire concludes that the only skepticism worth anything is skepticism of internal kind. In Law's Empire, Dworkin abandons simple picture of a lexical ordering between dimensions of fit and soundness. He stresses that within second dimension questions of fit surface again, because an interpretation is pro tanto more satisfactory if it shows less damage to integrity than its rival.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.