Abstract

Due to high computational costs associated with stochastic computational homogenization, a highly complex random material microstructure is often replaced by simplified, parametric, ergodic, and sometimes periodic models. This replacement is often criticized in the literature due to unclear error resulting from the periodicity and ergodicity assumptions. In the current contribution we perform a validation of both assumptions through various numerical examples. To this end we compare large-scale non-simplified and non-ergodic models with simplified, ergodic, and periodic solutions. In addition we analyze the Hill–Mandel condition for stochastic homogenization problems and demonstrate that for a stochastic problem there are more than three classical types of boundary conditions. As an example, we propose two novel stochastic periodic boundary conditions which possess a clear physical meaning. The effect of these novel periodic boundary conditions is also analyzed by comparing with non-ergodic simulation results.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call