Abstract
An overview of the modelling of quasi-brittle as well as ductile damage is given. The multiscale procedure employing the nonlocal continuum theory is described in more detail. The softening is introduced at the microlevel in the microstructural volume element and after that the homogenization procedure state variables are mapped at the macrolevel material point via the scale transition approach. In the case of quasi-brittle softening the C1 continuous finite element discretization is applied at both micro- and macrolevel. At the modelling of ductile damage response, the macrolevel is also discretized by the C1 finite element formulation, while the microscale utilizes quadrilateral mixed finite elements employing the nonlocal equivalent plastic strain and gradient-enhanced elastoplasticity. All approaches presented are verified in the standard examples.
Highlights
The modern structures are characterized by rising complexity, where requirements on reliability and efficiency are continuously increasing
Starting from the global macrolevel boundary value problem (BVP) expressed by K V = Fe − Fi, the global degree of freedom (DOF) vector V is used for the determination of the local DOF vector v at single element level
In contrast to the quasi-brittle damage modelling, here the Microstructural Volume Element (MVE) is discretized by mixed quadrilateral finite elements, and the C1-C0 transition procedure is applied
Summary
An overview of the modelling of quasi-brittle as well as ductile damage is given. The multiscale procedure employing the nonlocal continuum theory is described in more detail. The softening is introduced at the microlevel in the microstructural volume element and after that the homogenization procedure state variables are mapped at the macrolevel material point via the scale transition approach. In the case of quasi-brittle softening the C1 continuous finite element discretization is applied at both micro- and macrolevel. At the modelling of ductile damage response, the macrolevel is discretized by the C1 finite element formulation, while the microscale utilizes quadrilateral mixed finite elements employing the nonlocal equivalent plastic strain and gradient-enhanced elastoplasticity. All approaches presented are verified in the standard examples
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call