Abstract

Global and regional positional accuracy assessment is of the highest importance for any satellite navigation system, including the Global Positioning System (GPS). Although positioning error can be expressed as a vector quantity with direction and magnitude, most of the research focuses on error magnitude only. The positional accuracy can be evaluated in terms of navigational quadrants as further refinement of error distribution, as it was shown here. This research was conducted in the wider area of the Northern Adriatic Region, employing the International Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Service (IGS) data and products. Similarities of positional accuracy and deviations distributions for Single Point Positioning (SPP) were addressed in terms of magnitudes. Data were analyzed during the 11-day period. Linear and circular statistical methods were used to quantify regional positional accuracy and error behavior. This was conducted in terms of both scalar and vector values, with assessment of the underlying probability distributions. Navigational quadrantal positioning error subset analysis was carried out. Similarity in the positional accuracy and positioning deviations behavior, with uneven positional distribution between quadrants, indicated the directionality of the total positioning error. The underlying distributions for latitude and longitude deviations followed approximately normal distributions, while the radius was approximated by the Rayleigh distribution. The Weibull and gamma distributions were considered, as well. Possible causes of the analyzed positioning deviations were not investigated, but the ultimate positioning products were obtained as in standard, single-frequency positioning scenarios.

Highlights

  • Introduction and BackgroundWhether it is expressed as predictable, repeatable, or relative, positioning accuracy [1]can be defined as a difference between true and measured position

  • The density scale on respective figures is relative to each station positioning deviation distributions

  • Linear statistics revealed that northern navigational quadrants (IV, I) had more deviated positions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction and BackgroundWhether it is expressed as predictable, repeatable, or relative, positioning accuracy [1]can be defined as a difference between true and measured position. Whether it is expressed as predictable, repeatable, or relative, positioning accuracy [1]. The positioning error is of unreserved importance for the overall performance of Global Navigation Satellite. In terms of error values or positioning deviations, the satellite positioning accuracy can be expressed in numerous measures. Linear measures, such as Northing and Easting errors in meters in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), are commonly used [3]. One-dimensional Root Mean Square (RMS) error in meters, two-dimensional RMS (DRMS), twice distance value of two-dimensional RMS (2DRMS) are used, the latter being the most common measure for navigational purposes.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call