Abstract

In 1975, the physician Raymond Moody published the bestseller Life after Life. Moody introduced the term ‘near-death experience’ in his book to describe specific experiences of people who have survived a life-threatening situation. Meanwhile, measuring instruments for the operationalization of near-death experiences have been developed and numerous, partly prospective, clinical studies have been conducted to investigate these experiences. While empirical research is already conducted on a high scientific level, there is still room for a systematic foundation for a philosophical and ontological interpretation of near-death experiences. Difficulties associated with the interpretation of near-death experiences are partly caused by the fact that the term ‘near-death experience’ is not used consistently in literature, but ambiguously and vaguely. Following the tradition of Analytic Philosophy, the aim of this work is to lay the linguistic foundations for a philosophical and ontological discussion of near-death experiences. In this context, we will distinguish between a near-death experience, a near-death memory and a near-death report, and present precise definitions of these terms. Finally, different ontological positions that can be formulated with the provided definitions will be presented.

Highlights

  • In his bestseller Life after Life (1975), Raymond Moody presented a qualitative psychological research study, in which he interviewed people who had been revived after being clinically dead [1]

  • Moody identifies 15 recurring elements that are repeatedly mentioned in the accounts of people who had a near-death experience: (1) the ineffability of the experience, (2) hearing that one is declared dead, (3) an intense feeling of peace, (4) the perception of noises, (5) the crossing of a tunnel, (6) the separation of consciousness from the physical body, (7) encountering deceased people, (8) meeting a being of light, (9) a life review, (10) reaching a border, (11) returning to one’s body, (12) trying to communicate, (13) after-effects on one’s life, (14) a new view of death, and (15) the corroboration of the reality of the experience [5, 6]

  • Definition 5 does not imply that a person with a near-death memory in the narrower sense had a NDE in the narrower sense

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In his bestseller Life after Life (1975), Raymond Moody presented a qualitative psychological research study, in which he interviewed people who had been revived after being clinically dead [1]. Moody identifies 15 recurring elements that are repeatedly mentioned in the accounts of people who had a near-death experience: (1) the ineffability of the experience, (2) hearing that one is declared dead, (3) an intense feeling of peace, (4) the perception of noises, (5) the crossing of a tunnel, (6) the separation of consciousness from the physical body, (7) encountering deceased people, (8) meeting a being of light, (9) a life review, (10) reaching a border, (11) returning to one’s body, (12) trying to communicate, (13) after-effects on one’s life, (14) a new view of death, and (15) the corroboration of the reality of the experience [5, 6]. If NDEs were real experiences, this would have serious implications for our understanding of the human brain and consciousness

Operationalization
Weighted Core Experience Index
Near-Death Experience Scale
15 Did you see deceased spirits or religious figures?
Definition
Near-Death Experience
Near-Death Memory
Near-Death Report
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call