Philosophical Perspectives on International Aid and Development

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore the philosophical perspectives on international aid and development. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the philosophical perspectives on international aid and development. Preliminary empirical review revealed that international aid is a moral obligation based on justice and equity, rather than optional generosity. It critiqued the effectiveness and motives of aid distribution, emphasizing the need for strategic approaches that empower recipients and address root causes of poverty. The study highlighted the importance of aligning aid with social justice and human rights, advocating for development that integrates economic, social, and political dimensions. It also called for reevaluating power dynamics in aid relationships, promoting egalitarian partnerships based on mutual respect and shared goals. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Utilitarianism, Deontology and Postcolonial Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the philosophical perspectives on international aid and development. The study recommended that theoretical models of international development incorporate ethical principles such as justice, equity, and human rights, shifting from a purely economic focus to a more inclusive approach. Practitioners were encouraged to engage in continuous ethical reflection, build genuine partnerships with local communities, and prioritize capacity-building initiatives. For policymakers, the study advocated for integrating ethical considerations into development policies, adopting a rights-based approach, and promoting sustainable practices. These recommendations contributed to theoretical discourses by challenging traditional paradigms, provided practical guidelines for more effective interventions, and offered a roadmap for creating ethical and sustainable development policies.