Abstract

Built mostly centuries ago, heritage buildings as well the more contemporary buildings of the last century, which have lost the bearing capacity often need restoration and strengthening, especially in seismic regions and in regions with shrinkage phenomena (subsidence region). The need of strengthening of the building constructions during exploitation appears mostly because of their premature wear as a result of technological influences and weathering, various damage and various other factors.
 Traditional methods of strengthening are effective, but in some cases not appropriate or not applicable for use. An example is the increase of the load-bearing structures of historical buildings, preserving the external appearance of which is the determining factor. In this case, the use of the discussed alternative methods can be justified alternative.
 Knowledge of the causes of defects and damage of structures allows to choose the best option of repairing or strengthening.
 The aim of the research is the evaluation of the structural performance of composite fibre-reinforced elements in the wider sector of the conservation of historical, architectonic and environmental heritage, as well the more contemporary buildings of the last century, which have lost of the bearing capacity focusing reliability indexes and the appearance of the structure.
 In the article was described and analyzed the existing traditional methods and the alternative methods of strengthening by FRP-materials (composite materials) such building structures as masonry, metal structures, reinforced concrete, and the computation in software ABAQUS. These procedures of strengthening building structures by FRP-materials in Ukraine are not widely used due to the lack of a regulatory framework that would regulate their use, as well because these materials are relatively expensive compared to the traditional ones.
 The article analyzed the existing methods of computation and design of the strengthening using FRP-materials, and the computation in software ABAQUS was performed with conclusions and recommendations based on results of the computation.
 The aim of the work was to review the technology and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each of the strengthen methods that should be used when choosing effective solutions for strengthening building structures. In conclusion, the need for further study and researches was confirmed.

Highlights

  • IntroductionHeritage buildings as well the more contemporary buildings of the last century, which have lost the bearing capacityoften need restoration and strengthening, especially in seismic regions and in regions with shrinkage phenomena (subsidence region)

  • Built mostly centuries ago, heritage buildings as well the more contemporary buildings of the last century, which have lost the bearing capacityoften need restoration and strengthening, especially in seismic regions and in regions with shrinkage phenomena

  • The aim of the research is the evaluation of the structural performance of composite fibrereinforced elements in the wider sector of the conservation of historical, architectonic and environmental heritage, as well the more contemporary buildings of the last century, which have lost of the bearing capacity focusing reliability indexes and the appearance of the structure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heritage buildings as well the more contemporary buildings of the last century, which have lost the bearing capacityoften need restoration and strengthening, especially in seismic regions and in regions with shrinkage phenomena (subsidence region). The need of strengthening of the building constructions during exploitation appears mostly because of their premature wear as a result of technological influences and weathering, various damage and various other factors. Traditional methods of strengthening are effective, but in some cases not appropriate or not applicable for use. An example is the increase of the loadbearing structures of historical buildings, preserving the external appearance of which is the determining factor. In this case, the use of the discussed alternative methods can be justified alternative. Knowledge of the causes of defects and damage of structures allows to choose the best option of repairing or strengthening.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call