Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, it discusses Douglass North's new economic history approach by putting it in a broader methodological and theoretical perspective, elucidating the (large) extent to which North's basic tenets rely upon a methodological perspective based on individualism. It is argued that description of historical-economic processes centered on the individual cannot convincingly explain the ac tual dynamics and evolution of institutions, which is admittedly one of the main desiderata of North's approach. On the other hand, we claim that a more satisfactory perspective has to take account of the co-evolution of individual choices and social institutions by means of a careful description of the simultaneous bottom-up and top-down processes through which institutions emerge from the (complex) aggregation of individual behaviours while behaviours themselves are modified by the incumbent institutional setting. Finally, we draw a sketch of the conceptual pillars of this alternative approach and discuss its main implications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.