Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aims to understand how older patients experience shared decision-making (SDM) when making decisions about the treatment of their distal radius fracture (DRF). MethodsAn exploratory qualitative study was designed using individual in-person and telephone interviews. Twelve DRF patients were recruited during their first follow-up visit to a Danish outpatient clinic, with ten of them participating in interviews. Data was analysed using content analysis. ResultsThree themes emerged: 1) An acute situation, 2) Considerations influencing the treatment choice and 3) The treatment decision. ConclusionIn conclusion, our study represents a pioneering effort in reporting the use of Shared Decision Making in fracture management. The sudden onset of DRF proved to be highly distressing for the patients. Providing SDM material to patients in the Emergency department (ED) aimed to empower them and prepare them for their subsequent outpatient clinic visit. However, its effectiveness varied. The demeanour of doctors played a crucial role in shaping patient experiences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.