Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome is a widespread and under-diagnosed condition, making it a major public health and safety issue. The objective of this article was to clarify some of the evidence-based elements of therapeutic decision-making and the information provided to the patient and family on the benefit-cost-security ratio of several of his therapeutic options. Published data on the effectiveness of oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children, the durability of their effects, the therapeutic possibilities of maxillary or bimaxillary expansion, and the interrelationships between permanent teeth extractions and obstructive sleep disordered breathing, were researched and analyzed. Based on available evidence, in growing patients with Class II malocclusion, treatment with functional orthopedic devices can increase the volume of the pharyngeal airway and thus hopefully reduce the risk of developing OSA. An improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index and lower oxygen saturation was observed in children treated with rapid maxillary expansion. Permanent teeth extractions prescribed for the treatment of teeth crowding in an orthodontic age patient do not result in any significant change in the upper airway. The role of the orthodontist in the multidisciplinary team in the screening and management of Obstructive Sleep Disordered Breathing (OSDB) is essential. By combining clinical experience with published data on various therapeutic approaches, the orthodontist helps the patient to benefit from better adapted care and a more sustainable outcome, while taking into account his or her preferences.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call