Abstract

IntroductionThrombus density may be a predictor for acute ischemic stroke treatment success. However, only limited data on observer variability for thrombus density measurements exist. This study assesses the variability and bias of four common thrombus density measurement methods by expert and non-expert observers.MethodsFor 132 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke, three experts and two trained observers determined thrombus density by placing three standardized regions of interest (ROIs) in the thrombus and corresponding contralateral arterial segment. Subsequently, absolute and relative thrombus densities were determined using either one or three ROIs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined, and Bland–Altman analysis was performed to evaluate interobserver and intermethod agreement. Accuracy of the trained observer was evaluated with a reference expert observer using the same statistical analysis.ResultsThe highest interobserver agreement was obtained for absolute thrombus measurements using three ROIs (ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 0.91). In general, interobserver agreement was lower for relative measurements, and for using one instead of three ROIs. Interobserver agreement of trained non-experts and experts was similar. Accuracy of the trained observer measurements was comparable to the expert interobserver agreement and was better for absolute measurements and with three ROIs. The agreement between the one ROI and three ROI methods was good.ConclusionAbsolute thrombus density measurement has superior interobserver agreement compared to relative density measurement. Interobserver variation is smaller when multiple ROIs are used. Trained non-expert observers can accurately and reproducibly assess absolute thrombus densities using three ROIs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1607-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Thrombus density may be a predictor for acute ischemic stroke treatment success

  • Four methods have been employed in the recent literature: absolute thrombus density in Hounsfield unit and relative thrombus density in Hounsfield unit using either one or three regions of interest (ROIs)

  • As it can be difficult to detect low-density thrombi on non-contrast CT (NCCT), and standardized CT angiography (CTA) imaging is increasingly used as part of standard admission protocol for patients suspected of acute stroke [1], CTA is commonly used for visual support in most thrombus density studies [3,4,5, 9,10,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thrombus density may be a predictor for acute ischemic stroke treatment success. This study assesses the variability and bias of four common thrombus density measurement methods by expert and non-expert observers. Methods For 132 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke, three experts and two trained observers determined thrombus density by placing three standardized regions of interest (ROIs) in the thrombus and corresponding contralateral arterial segment. Absolute and relative thrombus densities were determined using either one or three ROIs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined, and Bland–Altman analysis was performed to evaluate interobserver and intermethod agreement. Thrombus density on non-contrast CT (NCCT) has been shown to be a potential predictor for acute ischemic stroke treatment success [2,3,4,5]. The impact of expertise and the bias due to using one ROI instead of three ROIs have not been studied

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call