Abstract
The diel variation of meteorological conditions strongly influences the formation processes of secondary air pollutants. However, due to the complexity of sampling highly reactive chemical compounds, significant information about their transformation and source can be lost when sampling over long periods, affecting the representativeness of the samples. In order to determine the contribution of primary and secondary sources to ambient levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and quinones, measurements of gas and PM1 phases were conducted at an urban site in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Area (GMA) using a 4-h sampling protocol. The relation between PAHs, quinones, criteria pollutants, and meteorology was also addressed using statistical analyses. Total PAHs (gas phase + PM1 phase) ambient levels ranged between 184.03 ng m−3 from 19:00 to 23:00 h and 607.90 ng m−3 from 07:00 to 11:00 h. These figures both coincide with the highest vehicular activity peak in the morning and at night near the sampling site, highlighting the dominant role of vehicular emissions on PAHs levels. For the gas phase, PAHs ranged from 177.59 to 595.03 ng m−3, while for PM1, they ranged between 4.81 and 17.44 ng m−3. The distribution of the different PAHs compounds between the gas and PM1 phases was consistent with their vapour pressure (p °L) reported in the literature, the PAHs with vapour pressure ≤ 1 × 10−3 Pa were partitioned to the PM1, and PAHs with vapour pressures ≥ 1 × 10−3 Pa were partitioned to the gas phase. PAHs diagnostic ratios confirmed an anthropogenic emission source, suggesting that incomplete gasoline and diesel combustion from motor vehicles represent the major share of primary emissions. Quinones ambient levels ranged between 18.02 ng m−3 at 19:00–23:00 h and 48.78 ng m−3 at 15:00–19:00 h, with significant increases during the daytime. The distribution of quinone species with vapour pressures (p °L) below 1 × 10−4 Pa were primarily partitioned to the PM1, and quinones with vapour pressures above 1 × 10−4 Pa were mainly partitioned to the gas phase. The analysis of the distribution of phases in quinones suggested emissions from primary sources and their consequent degradation in the gas phase, while quinones in PM1 showed mainly secondary formation modulated by UV, temperature, O3, and wind speed. The sampling protocol proposed in this study allowed obtaining detailed information on PAHs and quinone sources and their secondary processing to be compared to existing studies within the GMA.
Highlights
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) represent a significant fraction of organic compounds present both in the gas and particulate phases
We presented new information about the distribution, diurnal variation, and origin of fourteen PAHs and seven quinones in the gas phase and PM1 during short-time lapses of sampling in one urban site in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Area (GMA)
The ΣPAHs and individual PAH levels varied throughout the day, and some of them showed positive correlations with some primary pollutants, like ΣPAHs(Total) versus CO and ΣPAHs(Total) versus NO (r = 0.71 and r = 0.88, respectively p < 0.05), suggesting that, at the Tlaquepaque monitoring site (TLA) site, diesel and gasoline traffic emissions drive the ambient levels of PAHs
Summary
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) represent a significant fraction of organic compounds present both in the gas and particulate phases. Quinones are formed directly from combustion processes as in diesel and gasoline engines, as well as by oxidants in the atmosphere through the gas phase and heterogeneous reactions of PAHs. the quinones may serve as tracers to identify their emission sources and photochemical pathways [2,3]. The quinones may serve as tracers to identify their emission sources and photochemical pathways [2,3] They have a central role in allergic airway diseases such as asthma and cardiovascular effects due to their ability to generate oxidative stress, inflammation, and immunomodulating effects in the lungs and airways. The prediction of quinone levels is crucial as existing studies have shown them to be more harmful compounds than their precursors [4,5,6]
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have