Abstract
The differences between two differential Reynolds stress models (DRSM) and their corresponding explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models (EARSM) are investigated by studying fully developed axially rotating turbulent pipe flow. The mean flow and the turbulence quantities are strongly influenced by the imposed rotation, and is well captured by the differential models as well as their algebraic truncations. All the tested models give mean velocity profiles that are in good qualitative agreement with the experimental data. It is demonstrated that the predicted turbulence kinetic energy levels vary dramatically depending on the diffusion model used, and that this is closely related to the model for the evolution of the length-scale determining quantity. Furthermore, the effect of the weak equilibrium assumption, underlying the EARSMs, and the approximation imposed for 3D mean flows on the turbulence levels are investigated. In general the predictions obtained with the EARSMs rather closely follow those of the corresponding DRSMs.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call